On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:49:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > The idea is to start with something that has a limited impact, I > > believe the idea is to build up the pipeline in such a way that it > > can scale to the entire distribution, but we need to start > > somewhere and Atomic Host is a deliverable in itself and as a small > > set of packages making it easier to control and experiment with. > > Does that make sense? > Sure, it does, but if this becomes an actual aspect of Fedora, as > Matthew Miller wants (and it makes sense), then it makes little > sense to call the thing Atomic CI. Instead CI for Atomic would > be the first goal, but the overall aim is for the whole distribution. How about "Fedora CI: Fedora Atomic Host Prototype Phase"? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
