On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI >> > >> > I'd actually like to escalate this from a Change proposal (which >> > generally fit into Fedora releases) to a Council-level project >> > Objective. That basically means rename to >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objective/FedoraAtomicCI and file a >> > council ticket. :) >> > >> >> Why call this "Atomic CI"? Can't we call this something better that >> reflects that it would be beneficial for the entire distribution, >> rather than a small subset of Fedorans working in Project Atomic? > > The idea is to start with something that has a limited impact, I believe the > idea is to build up the pipeline in such a way that it can scale to the entire > distribution, but we need to start somewhere and Atomic Host is a deliverable in > itself and as a small set of packages making it easier to control and experiment > with. > Does that make sense? > Sure, it does, but if this becomes an actual aspect of Fedora, as Matthew Miller wants (and it makes sense), then it makes little sense to call the thing Atomic CI. Instead CI for Atomic would be the first goal, but the overall aim is for the whole distribution. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
