On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI > > > > I'd actually like to escalate this from a Change proposal (which > > generally fit into Fedora releases) to a Council-level project > > Objective. That basically means rename to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objective/FedoraAtomicCI and file a > > council ticket. :) > > > > Why call this "Atomic CI"? Can't we call this something better that > reflects that it would be beneficial for the entire distribution, > rather than a small subset of Fedorans working in Project Atomic? The idea is to start with something that has a limited impact, I believe the idea is to build up the pipeline in such a way that it can scale to the entire distribution, but we need to start somewhere and Atomic Host is a deliverable in itself and as a small set of packages making it easier to control and experiment with. Does that make sense? Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
