On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > I hope someone can help me with the following question: > Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) > Is there any way to express a dependency like that? Can you give an example of when this might be a good idea? It seems easy to go overboard with this without clear benefit. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
