On 04/12/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
I hope someone can help me with the following question:
Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like:
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e))
Is there any way to express a dependency like that?
Can you give an example of when this might be a good idea? It seems
easy to go overboard with this without clear benefit.
The example is dnfdragora, a nice new GUI for DNF. It uses libyui
abstraction to provide native GUI/TUI for GTK+3, Qt and ncurses. The
rich-dependencies ensure that the right libyui bindings get installed.
So an Xfce user would get libyui-gtk while an LXQt user would get libyui-qt.
Greetings,
Christian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
