Am 12.04.2017 um 13:58 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser
<besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser
<besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello folks,
I hope someone can help me with the following question:
Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like:
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e))
Is there any way to express a dependency like that?
Yes. Nested rich deps are supported.
Just another question:
Is each line of `Supplements:` being evaled and matched stand-alone?
E.g.:
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b)
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_c)
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_d)
Would that bring in the package by weak-deps if just one of the specified
supplements is matched?
I think so, yes.
Thank you for the clarification! =)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
