On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser <besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> <besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> I hope someone can help me with the following question: >>> Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: >>> >>> Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) >>> >>> Is there any way to express a dependency like that? >> >> Yes. Nested rich deps are supported. >> > > Just another question: > > Is each line of `Supplements:` being evaled and matched stand-alone? > > E.g.: > > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b) > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_c) > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_d) > > Would that bring in the package by weak-deps if just one of the specified > supplements is matched? > > I think so, yes. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
