Re: fedora stable branch updates Q&A policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Colin Charles <byte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 19:46 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak
> wrote:
> > Personally, i would believe a q&a mailinglist and
> a "testing" repo for
> > yum could be a good idea, in order to get packages
> as good tested as
> > possible - as fast as possible.
> 
> There is a testing repo, its called updates-testing
> (look
> in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo).
> Discussion of that
> happens at fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx as do the
> announcements for new
> packages
> 
> However, I don't think many folk test it and QA it,
> and it usually gets
> pushed out as an update (updates-released) within a
> couple of days
> 
> So, whats your issue with an update  that core had?


there were several regressions. kernels, gui for
firewall with relation to selinux, network manager and
so on. I am sure many of them are well know if you
search in the users list and bugzilla

=====
Regards
Rahul Sundaram


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux