fre, 28.01.2005 kl. 10.53 skrev Rahul Sundaram: > --- Colin Charles <byte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 19:46 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak > > wrote: > > > Personally, i would believe a q&a mailinglist and > > a "testing" repo for > > > yum could be a good idea, in order to get packages > > as good tested as > > > possible - as fast as possible. > > > > There is a testing repo, its called updates-testing > > (look > > in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo). > > Discussion of that > > happens at fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx as do the > > announcements for new > > packages > > > > However, I don't think many folk test it and QA it, > > and it usually gets > > pushed out as an update (updates-released) within a > > couple of days > > > > So, whats your issue with an update that core had? > > > there were several regressions. kernels, gui for > firewall with relation to selinux, network manager and > so on. I am sure many of them are well know if you > search in the users list and bugzilla > And now, the openoffice bug. Major one (wrong shortcuts i think it was)
