Le jeudi 27 janvier 2005 Ã 18:52 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun a Ãcrit : > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:40:38AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > FC5. So I'll stop loosing my time arguing about it here and let software > > obsolescence follow its natural course. > > Which is the only decent course of action. To argue for xmms' removal > *now* because rhythmbox will eventually be as good/better then xmms > is just plain silly. And completely non-productive. That's not what I wrote. For me rhythmbox is slightly better _now_. And with it getting better all the time ever die-hard xmms fanatics will have an hard time keep it in-core by FC5 time (not that some of the arguments advanced are not already verging on the outrageous). Which means *I* don't have to make a desesperate last stand today because I know which side will win eventually, if not in FC4 then in FC5. If I were deeply attached to the xmms-way of doing things like you obviously are I'd push for beep/bmp inclusion now because its lead over a more mature totem/rhythmbox might not be so obvious in several months. No sense to put my money (or in this case, my words) on a dying horse. This is advice freely given, you can ignore it if you wish (but do not complain later). -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
