On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 15:52:53 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Please start playing with those specs files which I've posted. You have seen my reply to that faulty test case of yours, haven't you. Nothing would change. > I fully understand that it is not easy to understand some new approach if > so long so many people been using some other variant which suppose to be > correct but is not. It is the opposite. It is _you_, who would need to look under the hood and figure out the exact behaviour of RPM and related package tools. See whether the behaviour is well-defined. Talk to the developers and find out which problems and pitfalls they are aware of and how they want to handle them. Alternatively, come up with a new definition of how RPM and related tools ought to handle Obsoletes tags and related update/upgrade/downgrade scenarios, and convince the developers that changing behavior would be worthwhile. > Does it really not lights up some bulb inside your mind? .. maybe at least > some small spark? Enough is enough! It's sad you've had to turn that way. I've got something else for you at this point: *plonk* _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
