On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:26:31 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 29 March 2017 at 17:04, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > It has been discussed several times, has met resistance and lead to > > actions like > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemPythonExecutablesUseSyst > > emPython > > but I don't remember any special section in the guidelines about it. > > > > Quote from this page: > > "Detailed Description > --- > Fedora ships numerous executables written in Python. Many of them contain > the shebang line: #!/usr/bin/env python > > However, this makes it difficult to install alternative versions of Python > on the system. If a user wishes e.g. to install python 3 on the system, and > have a /usr/local/python in her PATH, this will break these executables. > > These system executables are expecting to use the system python, and thus > should use: #!/usr/bin/python." > > Last line of this fragment says clearly that #!/usr/bin/python should be > used. True, and I haven't claimed the opposite. You need to slow down, IMO, as it seems you've misunderstood me completely. It's really just that whereas some packagers have removed /usr/bin/env from their packages, others have refused to do that, and neither the Review Guidelines nor the Packaging Guidelines contain anything about removing /usr/bin/env. In various reviews that would make it more difficult to convince package submitters, and some would argue endlessly about wanting to keep /usr/bin/env. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
