Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:06:47PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> 
> 
> Dne 25.3.2017 v 07:14 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>> Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL
> >>> maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much
> >>> of a big deal? And vice-versa?
> >> Well, I don't want to get the EPEL bugs assigned to me.
> > And you would not get them so, everything is fine \ó/
> >
> 
> So the POC as it it now would be preserved? Or there would be POC for
> Fedora and POC for EPEL?

Well, I would want to keep the situation as it is now (though I wonder if we
actually have one PoC per Fedora branch in BZ, I'll have to check this).

> Nevertheless, except the notifications and bug assignments, I don't mind
> much if there are ACL per branch or not.

Thanks :)


Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux