Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL
> > maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much
> > of a big deal? And vice-versa?
> 
> Well, I don't want to get the EPEL bugs assigned to me.

And you would not get them so, everything is fine \ó/



> > PS2: I am also considering this question having in mind the change in
> > branching model the modularity work will bring (ie: branch no longer tied
> > to a Fedora version but rather to upstream's version)
> 
> As I already mentioned in person when this came up in a DevConf talk, I 
> think that this is a plan that will likely break a lot of things, especially 
> the expectations all our users rely on (that everything in Everything has a 
> consistent guaranteed life time), and that doing away with that expectation 
> is going to make Fedora a lot less useful for many of our users (including 
> myself and probably also other contributors). Guaranteeing a life time for 
> the modules included in specific deliverables (spins, "editions", etc.) does 
> not help, because in the real world, users install many add-on packages from 
> our repository, its size is one of the main strengths of Fedora.
> 
> In fact, this change may even make me look for another distribution, and I 
> cannot be the only one. I cannot possibly track for each of the hundreds of 
> packages (not counting texlive-* because they all come from the same SRPM, 
> otherwise I would write "thousands" rather than "hundreds") that I have 
> installed when I have to manually switch to a later major version because 
> the maintainer arbitrarily decided to discontinue the version that I am 
> using. Nor do I want major versions automatically dragged in without 
> warning. The Fedora releases are a great point to put in major changes like 
> that.
> 
> All in all, I think modularity causes more problems than it solves. There 
> are major practical advantages of having global release branches with a 
> global lifetime.

I think your input here is valid, but I would propose you start a new thread for
this.


Thanks,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux