Re: How risky is lm_sensors's sensors-detect nowadays?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Friday, 24 March 9:27 a.m. -0000, Jeff Bastian wrote:
> Can Freon check if sensors-detect has been run before, and if not, pop
> up a dialog box asking to run it and warn about the risks?

Yes, if you haven't run `sensors-detect` yet, Freon says that you need to do so instead of showing the hardware temperature. This message is replaced with detected CPU temperature, by default, after you run sensors-detect.

Freon does not provide any warnings about the risk of using sensors-detect, though, not in the extension button or settings menu, or in its GitHub wiki. I only encountered warnings about risk when I looked at the man page before running the command.

On the upside, users would only know how to run `sensors-detect --auto` if they had already read the man page, likely including the risk warning, and if they see the Freon message and try running `sensors-detect` without arguments, then it triggers an interactive mode which also prints risk warnings. So I suppose, as long as I keep sensors-detect out of the package installation scriptlets, users should see a warning before anything risky happens.

I finally thought to just post an issue on the upstream GitHub (I believe this is the official repo):
https://github.com/groeck/lm-sensors/issues/17

The repo doesn't seem terribly active, though 😞
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux