Re: How risky is lm_sensors's sensors-detect nowadays?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/23/2017 08:43 PM, Andrew Toskin wrote:
... Does anyone here know the risk factors [of running sensors-detect],
and how much risk there really is today ...

My experience is that sensors[-detect] works best for an Intel x86* CPU
with 100% PCI/PCI-e cards, and for some older AMD x86* PCI/PCI-e systems.
Anything else is risky: ISA cards, non-x86* CPU, newer AMD x86*, etc.

For instance, look at the garbage shown by 'sensors' for two recent
systems that I assembled:

=====

Model name:            AMD A10-5800K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
(ASUS F2 A85M PRO board)

asus-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
cpu_fan:        0 RPM

radeon-pci-0100
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:        +31.0°C  (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:         +0.0°C  (high = +70.0°C)
                        (crit = +70.0°C, hyst = +69.0°C)

=====

Model name:            AMD A10-7890K Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
(MSI A88XM-E45v2 board)

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:         +0.0°C  (high = +70.0°C)
                        (crit = +70.0°C, hyst = +69.0°C)

radeon-pci-0008
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:         -8.0°C  (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)

fam15h_power-pci-00c4
Adapter: PCI adapter
power1:           N/A  (crit =  94.74 W)

=====
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux