Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro" <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 07:57 +0000, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> > > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it? 
> >
> > No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
> > installed gschemas are compiled at once based on the schemas
> > installed
> > on the system, and there are no precompiled schemas.
>
> A few of packages' sources include a gschemas.compiled file.
>
> $ file schemas/gschemas.compiled
> schemas/gschemas.compiled: GVariant Database file, version 0

Interesting... guess I'm wrong then!

I think that can be deleted?

It's possible that the extension searches for the schema source (not sure if I'm getting the terminology right) in a specific directory. Something like some extension did it until we patched it to try the default directory too - https://github.com/endlessm/coding-shell-extensions/commit/45e5c2b3bfaf86b29aaecc93b9180bfc8c6966a0


Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux