Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 01:04 +0000, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> I'd just like to confirm what actions I need to take for my RPM
> specs, then, if any. Does this sound right?
> 
> * if the package source includes a .gschema.xml file, it's okay, and
> needed, so leave it alone.

Yes.

> * if the package source includes a Makefile, which compiles the
> gschema file, then the schema compilation here isn't strictly
> necessary but doesn't hurt anything. Skipping this step would be
> slightly more efficient, but only slightly.

Yes. The compilation won't have any effect since it's only occurring
inside the buildroot.

> * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it?

No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
installed gschemas are compiled at once based on the schemas installed
on the system, and there are no precompiled schemas.

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux