Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 21:15 +0000, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> But then why is this such a prominent "Issue" in the output
> review.txt file? 

It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you
want to file a bug with fedora-review?

> And why does it warn me even when nothing in the spec, patches,
> and/or source files include the `glib-compile-schemas` command?

Well that's the issue it was trying to catch, missing glib-compile-
schemas. If you install a .gschema but don't recompile the schemas, it
will be ignored and so your application would crash unless you happen
to install another RPM that does compile the schemas in the same
transaction.

But nowadays we have RPM file triggers to ensure it happens
automatically, so nobody should ever call glib-compile-schemas in a
.spec anymore.

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux