Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 07:52 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 14:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > 
> > > My opinion of the change is limited to whether gnome-shell will still
> > > notify the user of device failures; if not, or if unknown then I think
> > > the change should be rejected as lack of device failure notifications
> > > in the DE is a regression that outweighs the benefit. It's
> > Any idea how this is working right now? AFAICT, there's no mechanism for
> > this other than 
> > a) running 'mdadm --monitor' or
> > b) watching journal for log messages of particular format
> > 
> > We could implement a similar thing for LVM RAID.
> 
> Well, all the world is not GNOME or any DE for that matter; mdadm has
> the mdmonitor service (enabled by default I believe) that will send
> email about MD RAID failures.  This is perfectly function for a server,
> so should have some functionally equivalent replacement for LVM RAID.
Sure thing, could you please file an RFE/bug report at

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=LVM%20and%20device-mapper

Thanks!

-- 
Vratislav Podzimek

Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux