Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 14:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > My opinion of the change is limited to whether gnome-shell will still
> > notify the user of device failures; if not, or if unknown then I think
> > the change should be rejected as lack of device failure notifications
> > in the DE is a regression that outweighs the benefit. It's
> Any idea how this is working right now? AFAICT, there's no mechanism for
> this other than 
> a) running 'mdadm --monitor' or
> b) watching journal for log messages of particular format
> 
> We could implement a similar thing for LVM RAID.

Well, all the world is not GNOME or any DE for that matter; mdadm has
the mdmonitor service (enabled by default I believe) that will send
email about MD RAID failures.  This is perfectly function for a server,
so should have some functionally equivalent replacement for LVM RAID.
-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux