I think that the support of proposed behavior will depend mostly on libsolv than DNF.
JaroslavOn Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 09:54 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Shall we work on a separate change proposal (on top of this one) that
>> > introduces debugsource and debuginfo subpackages? I think that could
>> > still make it for F26. But it would be good to do it as a separate
>> > step/proposal IMHO.
>> >
>> I suppose a separate proposal would be fine, but it seems like it
>> would be intertwined with this one anyway...
>
> Yes it would depend on the cleanups of the Parallel Installable
> Debuginfo change. But it seems better to make it a separate proposal. So
> that is what I did:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ SubpackageAndSourceDebuginfo
>
> Please feel free to add your name to it. We also need a dnf maintainer
> to help us with any necessary dnf debuginfo-install updates.
>
I've added myself to the page.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
