Re: F26 System Wide Change: Parallel Installable Debuginfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 09:38 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > These changes will make all files in any debuginfo file unique so they
>> > don't conflict when installed in parallel. There should be no changes
>> > necessary to programs (gdb, perf, valgrind, systemtap,
>> > systemd-coredump, eu-stack, abrt-hook-ccpp, etc.) that use build-ids
>> > or .gnu_debuglink to lookup DWARF debug information and source
>> > references for tracing, profiling and debugging.
>> >
>> > It would be good to tweak dnf debuginfo-install to know about parallel
>> > installable debuginfo packages and maybe have an easy option to
>> > install the debuginfo for a core file or for the packages running in a
>> > container.
>>
>> This also necessitates that we split sources out into a debugsource
>> subpackage, and ideally this should be able to be optionally disabled,
>> as downstream package builders may not want sources included for
>> debugging purposes (I've seen complaints from people about being
>> forced to disable debuginfo generation entirely because there's no way
>> to disable including sources). I believe the SUSE guys have already
>> done both of these things, and it would be worth it to talk to the
>> SUSE guys about their approach and pull it in to this.
>
> Yes. I am looking at integrating that idea into upstream rpm.
> But I wanted to split that proposal from this one which "simply" enables
> parallel installable debuginfo.
>
> I originally proposed this change for F25 but it took too much time to
> get all patches accepted upstream before the deadline. I am trying to
> avoid growing this specific change proposal and risk missing the
> deadline again.
>
> Shall we work on a separate change proposal (on top of this one) that
> introduces debugsource and debuginfo subpackages? I think that could
> still make it for F26. But it would be good to do it as a separate
> step/proposal IMHO.
>

I suppose a separate proposal would be fine, but it seems like it
would be intertwined with this one anyway...


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux