Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Friday, December 9, 2016, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:58PM -0500, langdon wrote:
> >Langdon is sitting right next to me right now and I'm going to tag him
> >in for more on Modularity.
[...]
> them. We can also decide when a "release" makes sense based on
> marketing or other considerations and just "pull the trigger" on
> that day. Or we could allow users to decide for themselves by opting
> in to a "rolling release" style of deployment.


This all sounds suspiciously like what I said would be the ideal. How
far from that, in the actual world, are we going to be with Modularity
when we get to, say, October 2017?

That does not work ... Without install media it might not be possible to install Fedora on hardware unsupported by the last release kernel for a long time. So not really "ideal". 
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux