Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:13:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Frankly, this all seems like a lot of churn and mess and process change
> for no very obvious benefit. I'm a hell of a lot more interested in
> looking at smaller and more frequent 'release' events than larger less
> frequent ones.

In a completely theoretical universe (spherical cow, anyone?), we'd
have something that we'd feel *could* be a perfect release every month,
week, or even nightly. Then, we'd decide whether or not to *make* it a
release based entirely on other factors.


> Maybe I'm not understanding very well, but none of this makes me
> terribly excited.

So, *did* you feel that the F25 cycle felt compressed? If we're close
enough to the theoretical-world above that we feel like we can do, say,
four month cycles to stay on track without experiencing (particular)
pain, maybe that's okay.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux