Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 09:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Trying to make this idea a little more concrete. Here's two suggestions
> for how it might work. These are strawman ideas -- please provide
> alternates, poke holes, etc. And particularly from a QA and rel-eng
> point of view. Both of these are not taking modularity into account in
> any way; it's "how we could do this with our current distro-building
> process".

Frankly, this all seems like a lot of churn and mess and process change
for no very obvious benefit. I'm a hell of a lot more interested in
looking at smaller and more frequent 'release' events than larger less
frequent ones.

Maybe I'm not understanding very well, but none of this makes me
terribly excited.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux