Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 09:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Trying to make this idea a little more concrete. Here's two suggestions
>> for how it might work. These are strawman ideas -- please provide
>> alternates, poke holes, etc. And particularly from a QA and rel-eng
>> point of view. Both of these are not taking modularity into account in
>> any way; it's "how we could do this with our current distro-building
>> process".
>
> Frankly, this all seems like a lot of churn and mess and process change
> for no very obvious benefit. I'm a hell of a lot more interested in
> looking at smaller and more frequent 'release' events than larger less
> frequent ones.
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding very well, but none of this makes me
> terribly excited.

I couldn't have summarised it better myself!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux