On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 13:33 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I think that ignores that we're pretty much always slipping, and they >> aren't in fact 6 month cycles. > > Well, since 22 we've got a lot closer to being back to May/November. > We've had: > > 22: May > 23: November > 24: June > 25: November > > so we've only missed once. 21 was early December. And that was the 1 year cycle which slipped a LOT * so on that evidence it might be damning for the new proposal. * Some of this was due to rel-eng process at the time where we didn't composes everything nightly so we often didn't know what was broken until we attempted a test compose at alpha. this was identified and has been fixed with the new "pungi 4" process where we do a full compose every night. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx