Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 13:33 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I think that ignores that we're pretty much always slipping, and they
>> aren't in fact 6 month cycles.
>
> Well, since 22 we've got a lot closer to being back to May/November.
> We've had:
>
> 22: May
> 23: November
> 24: June
> 25: November
>
> so we've only missed once. 21 was early December.

And that was the 1 year cycle which slipped a LOT * so on that
evidence it might be damning for the new proposal.

* Some of this was due to rel-eng process at the time where we didn't
composes everything nightly so we often didn't know what was broken
until we attempted a test compose at alpha. this was identified and
has been fixed with the new "pungi 4" process where we do a full
compose every night.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux