Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Gerald B. Cox" <gbcox@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Why are most people going to use superlu-dist when that's not the proper
>> name of the software?  I'm not familiar with a SuperLU user community,
>> but I think I can speak about DL_POLY as a DL veteran; I packaged it as
>> "dl_poly" and wouldn't expect people to call it "dl-poly" (outside
>> Debian) or "dlpoly".  The majority don't have underscores as part of
>> their proper name, but the guidelines cover ones that do.
>
>
> Who are most people?

Users of the software, for whom I'm packaging stuff.  I get the
impression some people don't think they're very relevant, and I
increasingly come across things which make life hard supporting them.

> Nobody is changing the name of the software.

As far as a user is concerned, you are.

> That is entirely under the control of upstream.

Who I think deserve respect for their chosen names as far as
possible/reasonable, even if they're not (former) colleagues.

> We're discussing how it is represented in
> the Fedora repository.
> That is the purview of the Fedora project, not upstream.

And clearly there isn't agreement in Fedora, even on what the guidelines
actually say, which was my point.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux