Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we
>> planned the next schedule as 6 or 7 months from the actual release.
>> This time, we tried to keep it to October even though the previous
>> release had slipped, resulting in the short schedule. I'm the person
>> who pushed for that (because of the value of calendar consistency),
>> and
>> I'm now saying it was a mistake.
>
> I still think it's a good idea for Workstation. We really need to be
> seen as the leading GNOME distro: that's what gets GNOME people using
> Workstation and recommending that other people install it, then those
> people recommend it... I think it's part of the story behind our recent
> rise in popularity. Right now we are that leading GNOME distro because
> we usually follow about 1-2 months behind a GNOME release. It's a huge
> advantage over, say, Ubuntu, where people complain about needing PPAs
> to get the latest software and upstream has already moved on to newer
> versions half a year ago. Right now this is one of our biggest
> strengths as a distro, and your proposal would throw that away. So
> there is real serious risk of changing this.
>
> Also, if we do one release per year, then I expect most of the Red Hat
> developers who work on GNOME would start using some unstable copr to
> get the latest GNOME; this means way fewer developers using and testing
> the latest release, since it's too stale. (I dunno what I'd do myself,
> stick around and use a GNOME copr, or try to go improve Tumbleweed...?)

I'd expect .1 or +1 would rebase on the most recent GNOME.


> I'm even concerned by schedule slippage into June; this is the time of
> year that I see complaints that Fedora is too old, go install Arch. I'd
> prefer that we always target early May and November releases for
> Workstation. I know, the early May is hard for GCC, but GCC isn't our
> user experience and I'm sure it can wait until the fall releases.

May is also good in that it's not yet "summer time".


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux