On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> still not sure what that means? Software is constantly being updated,
> evolving. How does running older versions of software increase
> "impact"?
I'm not saying running older versions increases it -- I'm saying I
don't think new versions at the rate we're putting them out are
necessary to get it.
> I don't believe we are "wasting" work. Regardless of their lifespan,
> all releases are appreciated and valued. They don't have to "age"
> like a wine. If you're trying to say resources are limited and the
> current release schedule has become unsustainable - that is another
> issue entirely.
Right, that's another issue.
By other issue I meant that if that was the actually driver behind what you are
asking, that made sense to me. "Impact" and "press coverage" are
very subjective criteria on which to base a decision.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
