On 05/12/16 11:30 +0000, Dave Love wrote:
Why are most people going to use superlu-dist when that's not the proper name of the software? I'm not familiar with a SuperLU user community, but I think I can speak about DL_POLY as a DL veteran; I packaged it as "dl_poly" and wouldn't expect people to call it "dl-poly" (outside Debian) or "dlpoly". The majority don't have underscores as part of their proper name, but the guidelines cover ones that do.
I agree with preserving an underscore if it's there in the upstream name. The guidelines mean that for a program called "Foo Bar" we should name the package foo-bar not foo_bar. But when the official name has an underscore I see no need to replace it. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
