Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "AW" == Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

AW> Meh, I disagree.

It a reasonable point, but there were strong opinions against forced
removal of packages in the manner you propose.  This did go through
FESCo as well.

AW> Personally, though, I think any non-maintained package should be
AW> retired.

Retiring such packages is something that already happens.  Forcibly
removing such packages from end user systems is not, and I certainly
don't want to be in the middle of that discussion.  If more changes to
the packaging guidelines are needed, I'm sure a draft will come to FPC
eventually.

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux