Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-11-18 08:38 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I don't recall anything about _forcing_ retired packages to be
obsoleted.  The current rules just say that you must do so if allowing
the package to continue to exist would cause dependency issues.  Forcing
the removal of packages from systems when not necessary is somewhat
draconian.

Meh, I disagree. But you're right that my current proposal doesn't exactly say that. Personally, though, I think any non-maintained package should be retired.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux