Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vít Ondruch wrote:
> While more convenient way is "dnf history undo last", which used to work
> with YUM, but is broken in DNF, since it does not keep the cache around,
> as Kevin pointed out.

YUM was also set up with keepcache=0 in the Fedora package, against the 
upstream default of keepcache=1.

In addition, even with keepcache=1, it would not find the package to revert 
to if it was no longer in the repos, I had to use rpm -Uvh --oldpackage by 
hand. No idea whether this is better in DNF, I didn't have the situation 
with DNF yet (and besides, I usually update with PackageKit, which has its 
own cache, and which doesn't do downgrades at all, leaving me with only the 
rpm -Uvh --oldpackage approach).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux