Re: Pondering security update time frames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 07:37:48AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > simpel problem. It'd be nice if we could reduce that turn-around time
> > to hours, if not minutes.
> If it takes several goes to get right it's clearly not a simple
> problem! 

I don't think that's so clear -- there's lots of cases where something
seems easy but the details turn out to be fiddly.

>           And for RCs rel-eng and QA have a process that circumvents
> all of the testing phase to get it straight into the compose so most
> of what you outline there for delays is actually garbage. We don't use
> this process for nightlies because they're not meant to be fire drills
> so should follow the right process.

That's what this is all about -- it would be ideal if the "right
process" were also a fast process, so that it doesn't have to be
special cases, circumvention, and firedrills. 

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux