Re: Pondering security update time frames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 October 2016 at 07:33, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For Fedora, I would suggest to replicate the separate security archive with
> its push mirrors.  The way the Fedora updates repository is updated seems to
> cause far more delays than what is lost due to build delays (the only part
> the embargoed builders could improve).
>

Just to clarify because people seem to think we have push mirrors all
the time. Our mirroring system is a pull mirror system where sites
either copy via http or rsync the files from the master mirrors.
Attempts to put in a push mirroring system have failed mainly because
other than a few sites most mirrors have no interest (or ability) in
running any distribution specific software or allowing some other
service push data to them.




> Florian
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux