On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 22:39 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +0000, Christopher wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the link. I didn't use to pay much attention to these > > > emails. I'll be more careful in the future. > > > > > > > There's a lot of noise on this list, and those emails are > > information > > overload. The fact that a particular package is affected is easily > > overlooked. It'd be nice if a notice could be shown in pkgdb to > > indicate > > that a particular package has dependencies in a problematic state. > > It'd > > also be nice if each package has its own list or notification > > feeds. > > I might get to send smaller e-mails to each person eventually, but in > the meantime the e-mails are not only sent to the list but also to > each > affected (co)maintainer individually. I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the retired package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the package are required to get these mails? What I find strange here is that I am a (co)maintainer for ccnet (watch & commit permissions only) but I didn't get these mails. > Therefore getting the e-mail > directly is indicates that one will be affected by the retirement and > searching for ones FAS name in the e-mail shows which package needs > to > be adopted. > > Kind regards > Till Regards, -- Julien Enselme http://www.jujens.eu/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
