On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > So I like the idea, I do propose to simply re-use most of > the blocker bug process for this, rather then inventing yet > another process. I guess this could even be integrated and > the way to get bugs on the list would be to propose them > as blockers as normal and then during the blocker meeting > when the vote says "no this is not a blocker" a second vote > is done to see if it is a critical bug. Let me phrase my earlier objection a little more strongly and personally: If someone tries to make me spend another three damn hours a week reviewing 'proposed critical bugs' I'm going to jump out a window and go start that yak farm. You won't see me for dust. :P -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
