On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK this is from just one thread, pretty much exactly two years ago. > It's a long thread so these are just extractions I think are useful in > getting a few different data points about the rationalization of > offline updates, and context for the use case where they're most well > suited (or not). > > And really the bottom line is, dnf update is fine the vast majority of > the time, except when it isn't. Failures are somewhere in between a > bug and not at all surprising. And people have been working hard on > solving this for years. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/YAWUZXOTCHWGPZ4RKKN22YSB575IEDIJ/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/NUJIJEZN5RV6E6DH7P2EM35OJUC3NM75/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4HHSIHSQM7HSQRT3KPLLF5MC7FVVTXAJ/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/36PTCP2G2I4FKZQSYNT4YLR22557ARBA/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZARJIYPOJKUACXFYWFHMSU4WHPDB4IPK/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6GIGWVDIKHGBEGWS7CWDRI5OSCS7NLYF/ > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ODNPCPTWNVFRGBGC2IQUA5VSSKGESAMV/ One more for that thread is good as well... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GH5WJZGD3O55IBGAM7IOUB4ZAHCHVUSI/ -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
