Chris Murphy writes:
> Seems to me it > would be more worthwhile to build in better error recovery within DNF than > to always require "offline" - especially > since the incidence of failure (at least anecdotally) just isn't that high. Sufficiently impractical that it's not possible.
Wrong.I can make any process survive an X shutdown, using an amazing tool called "tmux".
Why can't dnf do the same?
It's why openSUSE has spent a ton of resources, and a few bloody noses, getting completely atomic updates working with Btrfs and snapper, with very fine rollback capabilities.
You do not need atomic updates to install a signal handler for SIGHUP or SIGTERM. And maybe issue a setsid() call, beforehand.
This shouldn't be rocket science.
Attachment:
pgpQzfWRBEW1f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
