Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:54:45 -0000
"Timothy Ward" <gtwa001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Although I agree with the above then may be a builder should have a
> rawhide VM running with these updated critical packages if only for
> testing purposes to expose this type of failure. 

Sure, as I noted perhaps we should move some of the staging ones to
branched or rawhide. But thats just the start/easy part. Then someone
has to watch for failed builds, sort out which ones are caused by
package error or other packages or whatever and find the few caused by
the builder state and track them down. 

So, basically it's this problem x N. I personally don't have many free
hours a week to devote to this, and I doubt the kernel maintainers do
either. :) 

> The other concerns is that the package should have issued some sort
> of critical error message to the appropriate log before the limit was
> reached. and then start shutting down or limiting the process's or
> threads running. Is easy to say but may be a lot harder to actually
> achieve.

Yep. Would be nice, not sure how hard it is to do. 
 
> Although the change was communicated there needs to be a process that
> effective communication of these sorts of changes is sent to ensure
> that it will be picked up by more than just the fedora team leader
> which already has a fairly big workload.

Well, the change was communicated only in the NEWS file burried in
a bunch of other changes. 
> 
> It is a corner case at the extreme end as most testers probably would
> not have the hardware or knowledge to test effectively. Supplying
> info on how to test effectively may be a solution but will require
> someone to do it.
> 
> But I feel Kevin's and others involved frustration and the amount of
> time that trouble-shooting this would have taken.

Yeah, I just want to try and improve things so perhaps it doesn't
happen again/as much/as soon. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpn6h33ASPeZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux