On 09/22/2016 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora
On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense
either. It still is quite constrained.
* Perhaps after beta but before final we ping maintainers of
"important" packages asking what big changes have happened? Or
someone just goes thru the release notes for them all and proposes a
list of them?
I think this is good, but probably too late for some kinds of
decisions.
* Your brilliant idea here.
I think that we should have a general policy for packagers of
far-reaching infrastructure packages (systemd, glibc, kernel, whatever)
that any new restrictions or constraints should be disabled by default
in Fedora, regardless of upstream defaults, until we're able to have a
conversation — here, in the edition WGs, and/or in FESCo, as
appropriate for the particular change.
The particular issue came here with an upgrade to F24. Where does
rawhide fit into this? It seems like this should have been found
with rawhide or at least someone noticed an issue.
Thanks,
Laura
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
