On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense either. It still is quite constrained. > * Perhaps after beta but before final we ping maintainers of > "important" packages asking what big changes have happened? Or > someone just goes thru the release notes for them all and proposes a > list of them? I think this is good, but probably too late for some kinds of decisions. > * Your brilliant idea here. I think that we should have a general policy for packagers of far-reaching infrastructure packages (systemd, glibc, kernel, whatever) that any new restrictions or constraints should be disabled by default in Fedora, regardless of upstream defaults, until we're able to have a conversation — here, in the edition WGs, and/or in FESCo, as appropriate for the particular change. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
