Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:18 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:20 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> > 
> > It won't break software that uses NSS / OpenSSl / GnuTLS / glib-
> > networking.
> 
> I have only one concern: what about Qt stuff? Do you know?

I've just used f24 qupzilla to access a site with a relevant configuration.
I'm using the suggested configuration on my system, and the site loads fine.

So apparently QT uses one of the fixed underlying libraries.


> Anyway, I agree that you should prepare an F25 update for this. Just do
> not request a freeze exception, then it will be pushed to testing
> immediately after the alpha release.
> 
> I'm not sure I agree with pushing it to F23/F24 due to the risk of
> unexpected breakage -- you were CCed in [1] which was our chance to do
> that for F24 -- but it will probably work out fine....
> 
> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> g/thread/FTYLBKE5MU5E2OGD43G5HA7AXAZIKM7Q/#FTYLBKE5MU5E2OGD43G5HA7AXAZIKM7Q

I'm very sorry, but I had missed that thread. I blame bad folter filtering and
the large amount of emails. I've improved my filtering, to make sure I'll see
all emails I'm cc'ed on.

Kai
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux