On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/19/2016 08:29 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 22:29 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> Beta sounds a bit late to be introducing such a change unilaterally. >>> Should this not be going through FESCo at this point? >> >> Then I suggest that we make the change immediately for Fedora 25, to allow it to >> be included in the delayed alpha release. >> > > It will absolutely not be accepted as a Freeze Exception. Changes of this scale > are far too high-risk and will almost certainly result in another schedule slip. I'm having a hard time following the argument of scale and risk here when it pertains to schedule slip. The package itself is fairly self-contained and isn't likely to cause issues against the actual Alpha test criteria. Can you elaborate why you think doing this as an FE would cause a slip? josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
