On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:14:29 -0300 "Gerald B. Cox" <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jiri Eischmann > <eischmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > KDE has been interested in Flatpak for over a year. They even have a > > KDE runtime and a couple of KDE apps packaged: > > https://community.kde.org/Flatpak > > > That's a good thing...but I noticed that the page you directed me to > above was just created a few weeks ago, May 30th, 2016. My point was > while people may well be working on it, most people don't know > anything about it It used to be called xdg-app, so the flatpak name is pretty new. > - whereas snappy has been getting alot of press. Granted, it > formally was Ubuntu specific - but say what you want about Ubuntu, > they do a great job on marketing their brand. Flatpak may well be > superior and "better positioned" - however, unless people start > discussing it and marketing it - that won't make a difference and > we'll have a situation where the vast majority of applications are > packaged for snappy and not Flatpak. Is that a bad thing? I don't > know - but it is usually the way things end up. Just an observation. Well, we are discussing it now. ;) kevin
Attachment:
pgpax9SCs9bNB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
