On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 14:32 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > There's an article on Ars as well. The "working with Fedora > developers" > claim is probably a misunderstanding on Softpedia's part; it's not > true, and I doubt Canonical would have said that. Just for the record... the Softpedia article doesn't actually say "Canonical state that they have been working with Fedora developers to make this the universal packaging format." It does say they've been "working for some time with developers from various major GNU/Linux distributions" and that "the Snap package format is working natively on popular GNU/Linux operating systems like [...] Fedora [...]," so it's clear why there was confusion, but it doesn't say that they've been working with Fedora specifically. Michael -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
