Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:

I *strongly* disagree here.  The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
pretty good job with their sandbox.  The kernel attack surface is
reduced considerably, as is the attack surface against the user via
ptrace and filesystem access.  If Wayland is available (which is
should be!) then so is the attack surface against X.

What about the direct access to DRI device nodes? Why isn't this a problem that reduces the effectiveness of the sandbox considerably?

Thanks,
Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux