On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 20:53 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > I mean I really hope you're not saying that upstream developers will > be > able to start demanding that a third party packager's work is > removed > from Fedora! Hm... it's not supposed to be an antagonistic process. We were expecting it to be more of an "oh, upstream made a Flatpak, that's better than an RPM, so let's switch to that now." Certainly we're not going to come along and try to delete packages over the maintainers' objections. In general, I expect package maintainers would be deciding whether or not to make the switch, but yeah: if the upstream developers request that we switch to their Flatpak, I would hope that package maintainers would be willing to accommodate upstream. In the unlikely event that upstream gets into conflict with the Fedora packager over whether to replace the package with a Flatpak (or upstream-provided RPM), the current plan was for that to be handled on a case-by-case basis by FESCo. Hopefully such situations would be quite rare. Michael -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
